This is an interesting one.
I have been a fan of Thought Catalog for a long time, except lately their increasingly sexist / anti-feminist and plain idiotic posts have left me really turned off.
She’s received a lot of criticism, which is understandable. She’s running a “photography” site which consists of photos of her, naked, which she makes money off of, and is doing it as a sort of performance / identity art piece.
She makes a few interesting points in the Thought Catalog piece she wrote, comparing herself to the Duke university porn star as well as speaking out about her opinions on how LGBTQ peers have been praised for work that she feels is similar to her own.
I will say this: I am intrigued by her work. I didn’t pay to view her full site, but I support the free expression of sexuality. And, as we all know, I support sexuality in art. It’s a shame that she gets such violent backlash, but I suppose, as unfortunate as this is to say, that that’s to be expected with a “project” of this nature. It’s an interesting take on “art”… she is asking for curation and critique, and takes artistic aspects like composition, etc. into mind… and as performance art, she is making a variety of statements about feminism, sexuality, and the fine line between art and porn.
That’s where the main problem arises for me. The title of her TG article is “I Make Art Not Porn.” Not true. She’s making porn… as an art form. She is making porn. I just want that to be clear… she’s making sexually explicit and blatantly pornographic (in my opinion) images that you have to pay for and have to be 18+ to view… that is porn. But it doesn’t mean that it’s not art. She is making art. She’s making an expression of identity, a documentation of a journey, a presentation of artistic work… but… once again… it very very much is porn.